How to Catch Performance Issues Early… Before Even Needing a PIP
For many employees, the first sign that something is wrong is a calendar invite titled “Performance Discussion.” By the time that happens, the organization is already behind.
Performance Improvement Plans (also known as PIPs) are often treated as a starting point. In reality, they’re a last resort. When a PIP is necessary, it usually means performance issues went unnoticed, unaddressed, or avoided for too long.
In Part 1 of this series, we explained why performance management is not the same as performance reviews. This post builds on that foundation by addressing a critical question employers often ask too late:
How do we catch performance issues early — before they turn into formal discipline, disengagement, or termination?
The answer isn’t more documentation. It’s better performance management.
Why Performance Issues Are Rarely “Sudden”
Most performance problems don’t appear overnight. They develop gradually through small, often ignored signals:
Missed deadlines that become habitual
Declining quality of work
Increased defensiveness or disengagement
Missed expectations that were never clarified
Managers often notice these patterns but delay addressing them because:
They don’t want to seem confrontational
They’re unsure how serious the issue is
They assume things will “work themselves out”
Unfortunately, avoidance doesn’t protect morale — it damages it. By the time a PIP is introduced, employees often feel blindsided, embarrassed, or resentful.
This is one reason why organizations that rely too heavily on formal reviews struggle with retention, a challenge explored further in The Hidden Costs of Employee Turnover.
Why PIPs Fail as a First Response
Performance Improvement Plans are designed to document expectations and timelines. They shouldn’t be used to diagnose root causes.
Many leaders use PIPs as the first meaningful feedback. Our team advises against this because it can cause employees to feel unfairly punished instead of supported. It can also create fear instead of clarity or even trigger major defensiveness instead of improvement.
Why? Because the employee hasn’t been properly coached along the way.
A PIP should confirm what’s already been discussed, not introduce it for the first time.
The Early Warning Signs Managers Shouldn’t Ignore
Catching performance issues early starts with recognizing patterns, not isolated mistakes.
Inconsistent Results
When an employee occasionally performs well but struggles to sustain results, it often points to unclear expectations or missing support — not lack of effort.
Withdrawal or Defensiveness
Employees who disengage, avoid meetings, or become overly defensive during feedback conversations may already feel behind — even if no one has said it out loud.
Repeated “Small” Misses
Frequent minor errors, missed follow-ups, or unclear communication are often early indicators of larger performance gaps.
Without regular check-ins, these signals are easy to miss — which is why clear performance metrics and consistent feedback cadence are so critical
How to Catch Performance Issues Early (Without Formal Discipline)
Normalize Ongoing Performance Conversations
What’s the best way to avoid a PIP?
Remove the mystery altogether.
Our team of advisors emphasizes the importance of one-to-ones. These should cover:
What’s going well
What’s not working
What/where support is needed
What “success” looks like right now
The clearer a team is on these areas, the less likely they will need to even think about implementing a PIP. Moreso, they would have multiple opportunities to discuss where improvements could be made before they get drastic enough for a PIP.
When feedback is frequent, no single conversation feels threatening.
Address Gaps Immediately — Not Perfectly
Managers often delay feedback because they want the “right words”, especially how the employee will react or feel. But timely feedback matters more than polished delivery.
Instead of waiting, try:
“I noticed this deadline was missed — what got in the way?”
“This outcome didn’t align with expectations — let’s reset.”
Early conversations are about alignment, not blame. These openings also provide the employee an opportunity to share if there’s anything affecting their ability to do their job well.
Shift From Evaluation to Coaching
Performance management isn’t about judging past behavior — it’s about improving future outcomes.
Coaching-focused questions help surface issues early:
“What’s feeling unclear right now?”
“What would help you be more successful here?”
“Where do you feel stuck?”
This approach builds trust and reduces the fear that feedback automatically leads to discipline.
Make Expectations Explicit (and Revisit Them Often)
Many performance issues stem from assumptions — not capability.
Employees can’t meet expectations they don’t fully understand. Clear goals, success metrics, and priorities must be revisited regularly, especially as business needs change.
Organizations that lack this consistency often struggle with uneven manager behavior — a challenge discussed in our article about company culture.
What to Do When Early Intervention Isn’t Enough
Sometimes, even with coaching and feedback, performance doesn’t improve. When that happens, formal steps may be appropriate — but they shouldn’t feel sudden.
By the time a PIP is introduced, employees should already:
Know expectations clearly
Understand where they’re falling short
Have received coaching and support
Recognize that improvement is required
In those cases, a PIP becomes a structured continuation of prior conversations — not a shock.
Why Early Intervention Protects Morale (Not Harms It)
Many leaders worry that addressing issues early will hurt morale. In reality, the opposite is true.
Employees lose trust when:
Feedback is delayed
Expectations shift silently
Performance concerns surface without warning
Early intervention shows employees that they’re being supported — not set up to fail.
Clearer communication can prevent many, if not most, problems in the workplace… if given early on. Timely feedback allows employees to learn, adjust to changes in expectations and the workplace environment, and improve any performance issues that are brought to their attention.
It also prevents the culture damage that comes from micromanagement and reactive leadership, which our team explores in 7 Ways Micromanagement Destroys Your Company Culture.
Conclusion
Performance Improvement Plans shouldn’t be the starting line — they’re the safety net.
The difference? Fewer surprises, stronger trust, and better outcomes for everyone involved.
What’s Coming Next in This Series
In Part 3, we’ll tackle one of the hardest leadership challenges:
How to coach underperforming employees without hurting morale.
The final post will bring everything together with a practical framework for building a performance management system that actually works.
Need help and can’t wait for us to cover it in our future post?
Give us a call and one of our advisors can share expert guidance on solving people-problems in the workplace.
Frequently Asked Questions
-
Most performance issues stem from unclear expectations, inconsistent feedback, or lack of support — not poor attitude. When employees don’t know what success looks like or don’t receive timely guidance, issues often escalate quietly.
-
A PIP should be considered only after expectations have been clearly communicated and coaching efforts haven’t led to improvement. It should never be the first time an employee hears there’s a problem.
-
Feedback is more effective when it’s timely, specific, and focused on outcomes rather than personality. Regular feedback conversations reduce the emotional weight of any single discussion.
-
Informal feedback is critical, but it works best when paired with clear goals and documented expectations. Together, they create clarity without unnecessary formality.
-
The biggest mistake is waiting too long to address it. Delayed feedback often turns manageable issues into formal discipline situations that could have been avoided.
